Quotes

"Kids First"? Hardly. The true colors of a union leader

images

Albert Shanker, former AFT President

Next time you hear that tired old union baloney about putting “Kids First,” remember what the late Albert Shanker, former American Federation of Teachers president, once said:


“When school kids start paying union dues, that’s when I’ll start representing the interests of school children.”
Albert Shanker, The OC Register

This helps to explain the “Kids First” hypocrisy we continue to experience from union leaders, including those at CUSD, where many of their own rank and file have been influenced to ignore or deny the truth about dishonest special interest union politics.

Thanks for the brutal honesty, Albert. You’re a peach. We couldn’t have said it better.
Comments

Disgraced Marlene Draper spouted utter contempt for the voters she represented

page36_blog_entry322_1
Marlene Draper, The Orange County Register "When one of the ABC trustees indicated that the constituents of CUSD would be unhappy with the proposed increase in compensation, trustee Marlene Draper commented, 'It's not about them,' and pushed forward the vote approving the new, more lucrative contract offer."

The OC Register published this excerpt from a report by the OC District Attorney, dated September 2, 2008. Draper's statement was quoted from a February 25th closed session board meeting to discuss a permanent employment contract for Superintendent Carter. Draper's comment was in response to reform trustees Ellen Addonizio, Anna Bryson and Larry Christensen, who argued that a proposed $58,000-a-year raise was too high in light of the district's pending fiscal crisis. Their point was that such excesses were not in the best interests of the "them" in question...the constituents of CUSD. The District Attorney took issue with Draper's insulting, wrong-headed remark, concluding the report by mocking Draper with the obvious truth:
"It is all about them."
Comments

CUSD was at financial risk at the hands of the Old Guard long before state cuts were announced

Here’s the inconvenient truth that Superintendent Woodrow Carter, Old Guard CUSD trustees and staff and union bosses and PTA leaders would rather not discuss. As they all “Shout Out” to point fingers at their new common enemy in Sacramento, they turn attention away from themselves and years of disastrous financial failures they continue to cause or enable right here in CUSD.

Beverly de Nicola, Los Angeles Times "The district made $13 million in cuts this year, and $7.5 million of next year's cuts were planned before the governor announced billions of dollars in cuts to public schools earlier this month."

Due to years of mismanagement and deficit spending by the Fleming regime, CUSD already faced a financial crisis before the recent state cutbacks were announced. This is the inconvenient truth the senior trustees and staff will attempt to cover up by pointing their dishonest fingers at the state. The Fleming trustees and staff are responsible for the draconian cuts already planned due to the pre-existing financial disaster they created.

Now, after years of serial deficits and tens of millions in cuts due to their incompetence and misspending that already have hurt the children, they have assured that the impact of new state cutbacks will be even worse for CUSD than other, more responsible districts.

De Nicola is spokeswoman for CUSD.
Comments

CUSD teacher concerned about district's emphasis on standards, while quality of educational experience suffers

Mary Ann Irwin 5_2
Marianne Irwin, CUSD Board of Trustees Meeting "So I ask you, when we talk about the standards, I agree with the standards. I think they’re great. But the fact is, I’ve butcher-papered so many standards, every late start is standards. I feel like I’m calling audibles in a football game, 'Twelve point two four, twelve point…' I want to 'live it.' I’m really…I’m tired of just coming to my classroom and talking. I think we need to 'live it.' ”

Irwin made this statement during public comments at the October 15 2007 CUSD Board of Trustees meeting. Irwin is a 36-year teaching veteran who teaches world literature at Dana Hills High School.
Comments

CUSD teacher says district "plays with" statistics, touting 94% as going on to higher learning, when less than 45% complete four years

Mary Ann Irwin 5_2
Marianne Irwin, CUSD Board of Trustees Meeting "I think we need to address another statistic. The district has published a great one, and that is that 94% of our students go on to higher learning, when I know the fact is fewer than 45 are attending four years. And I think that’s a statistic that’s played with, and I think we can do better."

Irwin made this statement during public comments at the October 15 2007 CUSD Board of Trustees meeting. Irwin is a 36-year teaching veteran who teaches world literature at Dana Hills High School.
Comments

Teacher believes large classes have already pushed CUSD passed the threshold of a positive learning environment

page36_blog_entry330_1
Bill Hoffman, CUSD Board of Trustees Meeting "...on behalf of so many teachers, please do the moral thing and find a way to reduce class sizes. I don’t pretend to know the nuances of school finances, but I honestly believe we are beyond the threshold of a positive learning environment."

Hoffman made this statement during public comments at the October 15 2007 CUSD Board of Trustees meeting. Hoffman is a 31-year teaching veteran who teaches economics and laptop geography at Capo Valley High School.
Comments

Teacher says, with CUSD's increasing class sizes, students get less individual attention and teachers burn out

page36_blog_entry330_1
Bill Hoffman, CUSD Board of Trustees Meeting "It’s increasingly hard to help the kids individually with so many in one class. I think this hurts the average student more. They need the one-on-one attention to boost their achievement. Tutorials have become like a triage, helping those in greatest need. The rest of the kids have to take a number. These large classes may also be burning out many of your hardest working teachers. Whether it’s an AP, IP or beginning level class, I’ve spoken to many teachers who tell me it’s harder than ever just to keep up."

Hoffman made this statement during public comments at the October 15 2007 CUSD Board of Trustees meeting. Hoffman is a 31-year teaching veteran who teaches economics and laptop geography at Capo Valley High School.
Comments

More CUSD excuses - new SJHHS principal offers more pap to gloss over planning failures and serious safety issues

Tony Ferruzo
Tony Ferruzzo, The Orange County Register “Whether you are building a new house or a new school, you have to be flexible. There are delays you can predict and those that you can’t predict, and the ones you can’t predict are the most difficult...It will be slow going in, but once they are on campus it will be very exciting.”

Sure, Tony. Just keep up the excuses and happy talk to cover-up another long-term facilities planning disaster from the folks at CUSD. And keep pointing fingers at the roadway as the culprit behind the delays. Be sure to ignore the fact that even now much of the campus looks more like a construction zone that a school. And good luck getting CUSD to take responsibility for the delays for which they clearly were responsible. Ferruzzo is the principal (and spokeshole) of CUSD's newest high school, the controversial, $140 million (and counting) San Juan Hills High School, that has experienced numerous cost overruns, delays and continues to raise serious safety, financing, contracting, facilities equity, environmental and other important issues, yet to be explained by the CUSD trustees or administration.
Comments

CUSD spokesperson says CUSD is a 'full disclosure' agency, but district stonewalling tells a different story

Beverly DeNicola, email to The Full Disclosure Network "When we talked a few weeks ago you said that our district was stonewalling. I pointed out that you and I had never talked, and that I would be happy to provide you with any any information any time, just as I do with reporters and members of the public. I have spoken to our Board President, and Mrs. Benecke has asked me to provide you with information on her behalf. Neither she nor I will be available for an on-camera interview at this time. I am looking forward to receiving the questions that you said you would be sending to me. I will respond completely and honestly to your questions, except that, as I stated before, I am unable to address questions that go to the recall, which is a political process, or the legal process involving our former employees. CUSD is a 'full disclosure' agency. Give us a chance to prove that to you."

DeNicola sent this to Full Disclosure in response to an email from Leslie Dutton, whose repeated attempts to interview the CUSD trustees and Superintendent Fleming for nearly two years had been rejected by the district. As CUSD's Director of Communications, DeNicola carries on the tradition of her predecessor, David Smollar, by spinning to cover the district's obvious stonewalling.
Comments

Draper reveals yet another excuse for not discussing the peoples' business in public

page26_blog_entry87_summary_2
Seema Mehta, The Los Angeles Times "During the meeting, the board agreed to settle a potential lawsuit with the general contractor for the district's new $35-million headquarters. The district paid the firm an extra $3.8 million and signed the settlement during a closed-session meeting in August. Although potential litigation legally can be discussed during closed session, prosecutors questioned why once the matter was settled it was not made public. Lubinski asked why the district was trying to "hide" the cost overrun and deemed the superintendent evaluation meeting "a secret board meeting.” Draper said the board discussed in closed session that the payment should not be made public because it could make it easier for other district contractors to drive up prices."

Thanks for the explanation, Marlene. At least now we can all rest easy knowing that the improper concealment of the district’s financial affairs wasn’t your only purpose in violating the state’s open meetings law.
Comments

Draper spins herself sleezy, under oath, to justify secret meetings

page26_blog_entry87_summary_2
Marlene Draper, The Los Angeles Times "I wouldn't say it was secret. I would say it was supposed to be confidential."

This is Draper's testimony before the grand jury as she tried to defend the board of trustees' illegal, secret behavior. Since "secret" and "confidential" are synonymous, she offers a difference without a distinction. Now that really smells.
Comments

Draper says nepotism and cronyism is OK because it's not "technically" illegal, "It just smells."

Draper Won't Talk
Marlene Draper, CUSD Board of Trustees Meeting, May 7, 2007 "The Waldrip report said that it wasn't technically illegal. It just said that it ... smells."

Draper made this statement in response to a resident who criticized her for historically engaging in nepotism and cronyism by discussing and voting on district contracts with Culbertson, Adams and Associates, an environmental firm where Draper's daughter, Shawna Schaffner, serves as CEO. The Waldrip report had admonished the trustees to avoid the appearance of such improprieties, and cited the Culbertson and Adams agreement as an example. Judge Waldrip advised any trustee with such family relationships to abstain from such discussions or votes in the future, and speculated that the public would see the end of such improprieties as more reasonable judgement prevailed at CUSD in the future. Draper and the other Fleming trustees never apologized or took personal responsibility for any of the numerous wrongdoings confirmed by Waldrip. Instead, Draper disregarded Waldrip's admonitions and advice, discussed and voted for her daughter's contract at the first opportunity, and twisted Waldrip's words to justify her continued unethical conduct. Rather than raise the ethical bar at CUSD, as Waldrip recommended, Draper disregarded ethics and defended the bare legal minimum as good enough for CUSD ... even if it "smells." The crowd and the press were shocked. The new superintendent, Dennis Smith, put his face into his hands and shook his head in disbelief. The only person in the room who didn't seem to get it, was Draper.
Comments

Draper supiciously confident about outcome of Waldrip investigation

Draper
Marlene Draper, The Orange County Register "The most important factor is to make sure someone independent is looking at the entire situation ... Hopefully Judge Waldrip will come forward with some recommendations of how we can tighten this up and make this an even better district. I feel very comfortable that whatever comes out will benefit the district."

Gee, Marlene, any chance you heard about Waldrip's wishy-washy report before hand? Waldrip failed the "independence" test from the start, and though the report strained to make excuses for virtually everyone at CUSD, it's scope was actually limited to very few real issues. And how about those recommendations -- very little bark and absolutely no bite. The report clearly shows that no blame or accountability for you, your colleagues or staff were ever intended. No wonder you're comfortable.
Comments

Waldrip not impartial, but facts have vindicated Smollar and proven Fleming a liar

David Smollar, The Orange County Register "I don't believe Waldrip has proven himself to be an impartial judge. Everything I've said in any context has been proven factual. Most, if not all the things, Fleming said in denial have been proven false."

Whistleblower and former CUSD Communications Director Smollar's initial reaction to the Waldrip investigation report.
Comments

Waldrip report revealed two enemies lists

page59_blog_entry100_1
Jonathan Volzke, The Capistrano Dispatch "We learned there wasn’t just one list that coupled the names of parents active in the recall with information about their children, but two – the second even compiled after the recall attempt officially failed."

Volzke is the publisher of the Capistrano Dispatch.
Comments

Draper makes sarcastic remarks to anti-school expansion crowd

Draper
Marlene Draper, The Orange County Register "I hope that we would look at schools that would appreciate the improvement for their children."

Trustee Draper made this sarcastic remark to rebut the crowd's vocal disapproval of the district's proposed expansion of Arroyo Vista School at the March 9, 2003 Board of Trustees meeting, where local residents made public comments unanimously opposing the district's expansion plans. The meeting was carefully controlled by district officials to avoid discussion of the actual issues of concern to residents (i.e., overbuilding on such a small school site, unsafe traffic and other impacts on the local community, increased usage of the adjacent community park, etc.). Public speakers were kept to one minute instead of the usual three minutes for public comments to squelch community input. Those who tried to speak were met with sharp reminders from officials that the evening's discussion was centered on K-8s in general, not Arroyo Vista in particular, thus effectively killing the issues that were of real concern. Draper's comment was rebuffed with defiant applause from the Arroyo Vista crowd who opposed the intrusive changes proposed by the board and staff for their school, neighborhood and park.
Comments