Open Meetings Law

CFAC condemns Old Guard Trustees with "Darkness Award," branding them as foes of free speech and open government

cfac_assembly_2008
Old Guard CUSD trustees disgraced again as they are recognized as "incapable or unwilling" to comply with the law

Tomorrow, the California First Amendment Coalition, a freedom of press group, will present its annual Darkness Award to three recipients, including the CUSD Board of Trustees, in recognition of "conduct that thwarts freedom of speech and the public's right to know." The award follows the release of an OC District Attorney's report condemning the CUSD Old Guard trustees for their "disturbing disdain, if not outright contempt" for district residents. The same report praised the CUSD reform trustees for their commitment to end such disgraceful practices at CUSD.

Here is an excerpt from The California First Amendment Coalition's official blog:

The California First Amendment Coalition has named the 2008 recipients of its
“Darkness Award,” given in recognition of conduct that thwarts freedom of speech and the public’s right to know.  The awards, to be presented Saturday, October 18 at UC Berkeley, are given to:

-- The Capistrano Unified School Board, which was so indifferent to anti-secrecy laws that the Orange County District Attorney issued a public report outlining the board’s many violations of the Ralph M. Brown public meetings law. In a follow-up inquiry, the District Attorney found further violations and concluded that the board had proven itself “incapable or unwilling” of complying with the law. Read More...
Comments

Superintendent Carter and Trustee Darnold Sign Secret, Illegal Contract

page26_blog_entry188_summary_1

CUSD Recall leader says contract is unenforceable and calls for complete investigation

Tom Russell, Spokesperson, CUSD Recall Committee

My name is Tom Russell. I am the spokesperson for the CUSD Recall Committee.

On February 25
th -- the same night this Board called a Special Meeting to fire hundreds of teachers and increase class sizes, a split Board voted in closed session to offer Superintendent Woodrow Carter (aka Arnold Carter) a new three-year contract and a massive salary increase.

Understandably, a deafening public outcry immediately resulted, and hundreds of constituents urged Superintendent Carter to reject the offensive contract offer for the good of the district.

To his credit, Superintendent Carter publicly rejected the outrageous contract terms and on multiple occasions confirmed he would not sign the contract.
Read More...
Comments

Secret and Illegal Superintendent’s Contract Discovered

page36_blog_entry356_summary_1
Carter Podium Hi_2
• Superintendent Carter and Old Guard Trustee Mike Darnold Executed and Delivered Secret Agreement Purporting to Give Controversial Superintendent Huge Salary Increase and Golden Parachute

• Superintendent Had Publicly Rejected the Contract Offer


Rancho Santa Margarita, CA. Despite numerous public statements to the contrary, it has now been confirmed that CUSD Superintendent Woodrow Carter (aka Arnold Carter) and Board President Mike Darnold executed and delivered a secret and illegal superintendent’s employment contract. This action violated the California Brown Act and other applicable laws, and the contract is unenforceable for numerous reasons, including the following:

See
illegal secret agreement, press release, news coverage and speech delivered by CUSD Recall Committee Spokesperson Tom Russell at the May 12, 2008 CUSD board meeting. Read More...
Comments

ABC Reform Trustees expose, condemn new Brown Act violation by Fleming-era Trustees and call upon D.A. to intervene

page26_blog_entry130_summary_1page26_blog_entry130_summary_2page26_blog_entry130_summary_3

Joint Statement Condemns New Brown Act Violation and Effort to Conceal Critical Information from the Public

Ellen Addonizio, Anna Bryson and Larry
Christensen, the "ABC Reform Trustees"


San Juan Capistrano, Ca.
We believe that during our most recent March 24th board meeting, the four Fleming-era Trustees (Marlene Draper, Sheila Benecke, Mike Darnold and Duane Stiff) violated the Brown Act -- again. We believe the facts clearly demonstrate they did so with a specific intention to conceal from the public critical information they knew should have been made available to the public. As a result of this most recent flagrant violation (which continues a systematic pattern of illegal actions), we hereby call upon the Orange County District Attorney to immediately intercede. As a result of these illegal actions, we also will demand that the official agenda for our next board meeting on April 21, 2008 include an item calling upon CUSD to stop all expenditures and further action to construct the San Juan Hills High School Football Stadium Complex because all prior approvals for that project were obtained by presenting misleading and incomplete information to the Board of Trustees – and to the public.

On March 24
th, we recessed into closed session for the stated purpose of participating in a conference with legal counsel related to potential litigation. Agenda Item 3A was entitled:

A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant Exposure to Litigation: Two Cases…”

Read More...
Comments

Recall Committee files third complaint re Old Guard Brown Act violations in less than a month

page26_blog_entry138_summary_2
Letter from CUSD Recall Committee to Trustees Sheila J. Benecke, Marlene Draper, Mike Darnold and Duane Stiff

Complaint #3 re Brown Act Violations; Improper February 11, 2008 Meeting Agenda

Tom Russell, CUSD Recall Committee Spokesperson

Dear Trustees Benecke, Draper, Darnold and Stiff:

The purpose of this letter is to demand that you postpone and remove from the February 11, 2008 Board Agenda Items No. 37 – 41 relating to the construction of several multi-million dollar construction projects at the $150,000,000 San Juan Hills High School. For the reasons set forth below, taking action on these items would constitute a knowing and intentional violation of the California Public Records Act, the Brown Act and other applicable laws requiring competitive bidding.
Read More...
Comments

ABC Reform Trustees issue joint statement calling on Fleming Trustees to comply with Brown Act and transparency in hiring legal counsel

page26_blog_entry130_summary_1
page26_blog_entry130_summary_2
page26_blog_entry130_summary_3
Joint Statement Calling For Complete Compliance with the Brown Act and Transparency in Hiring New Legal Counsel

Ellen Addonizio, Anna Bryson and Larry
Christensen, the "ABC Reform Trustees"


San Juan Capistrano, Ca. In the election of November 2006, the people of Capistrano Unified School District elected the three of us to the Board of Trustees by 17% landslide margins of victory – a clear mandate for change. We ran as the “ABC Reform” candidates on a reform platform, vowing to restore honesty, integrity, accountability and transparency to CUSD.

In October of 2007, the Orange County District Attorney issued a report citing dozens of instances where the four Fleming-era Trustees (Marlene Draper, Sheila Benecke, Mike Darnold and Duane Stiff) illegally discussed district issues in secret behind closed doors, in violation of the Brown Act. In order to avoid further enforcement action by the District Attorney against them, Trustees Sheila Benecke, Marlene Draper, Mike Darnold and Duane Stiff accepted the findings of the District Attorney’s report, admitted they had repeatedly violated the Brown Act, and promised to fully comply with the law in the future.

They have broken that promise.

Read More...
Comments

CUSD Old Guard Trustees Violate Brown Act…Again

page26_blog_entry126_1
page26_blog_entry126_2
page26_blog_entry126_3
page26_blog_entry126_4
Admitted Law Breakers Authorized Bidding for Millions – With No Public Notice

Sheila Benecke, Marlene Draper, Mike Darnold and Duane Stiff, the "Fleming-era Trustees"

Rancho Santa Margarita, CA – The CUSD Recall Committee filed a formal complaint against Capistrano Unified School District Trustees Shelia Benecke, Marlene Draper, Mike Darnold and Duane Stiff, for actions they took during their most recent CUSD Board Meeting in violation of the Brown Act and other applicable laws.

In particular, Trustees Draper, Benecke, Darnold and Stiff (the four senior, members of the Board who served with recently-indicted former Superintendent James Fleming) voted to approve sending several highly controversial, multi-million dollar construction projects out to bid
projects that were never placed upon an official board agenda. Read More...
Comments

Old guard snubs ABC's and voter mandate...again

page26_blog_entry89_summary_1
page26_blog_entry89_summary_2
page26_blog_entry63_summary_3
page26_blog_entry63_summary_4
It was only a month ago that the Fleming-era trustees (Benecke, Draper, Darnold and Stiff) accepted the findings of a scathing report by the Orange County District Attorney, confirming that they had repeatedly violated the state's open meeting law by conducting the district's business in illegal closed session meetings. But last night, these unrepentant trustees demonstrated once again that they have no shame, using their 4-3 majority to elect three of their own, Darnold, Stiff and Benecke, to serve as president, vice president and clerk of the board for the next year. ABC reform trustee Anna Bryson was defeated in bids to become president and vice president in successive 3-4 votes.

The status quo Fleming-era trustees continue to prove how out of touch they are with the reform mandate sent by their constituents in the November 2006 general election when the ABC reform trustees were elected in landslide victories. Last night, the contrast between the status quo senior trustees and the ABC reform trustees couldn't have been clearer. It was also clear that the old guard is hunkering down for a fight to the bitter end, leaving no doubt that district reform will be impossible as long as they remain, and leaving reformers no choice but to complete the recall of Benecke and Draper ASAP.
Comments

OC Register editorial calls for Fleming-era trustees to resign

Clouds lifting at CUSD, Board accepts that it violated open-meeting law
page59_blog_entry330_1

Editorial, The Orange County Register The Capistrano Unified School Board’s 4-0 decision last week to accept the Orange County district attorney’s findings that the board had repeatedly violated the state’s open meetings law was perhaps the most sensible decision the board has made in quite a long time. The three newest board members – Anna Bryson, Ellen Addonizio and Larry Christensen – rightly abstained from the vote, given that they had nothing to do with the legal violations of the past board. Read More...
Comments

With chronic open-meetings law violations confirmed by D.A., chorus of outrage and demands for resignations grows

page26_blog_entry89_summary_1
page26_blog_entry89_summary_2
With their guilt confirmed by the District Attorney, the only honorable thing for the Fleming-era trustees to do is resign. Due to their repeated breaches of the public trust, the district cannot heal or "move on" until they are gone. Their refusal to resign at this point would be selfish and arrogant, inviting prosecutions by the District Attorney, causing further disruption to the district and forcing the need for recall -- all at the expense of the children.

Sheila Benecke and Marlene Draper
Two of the Fleming-era trustees
Read More...
Comments

Trustee Stiff admits the Fleming-era trustees knowingly violated the law!

page69_blog_entry48_1
• Stiff speaks out and rises above his corrupt Fleming-era colleagues.
• It's "case closed" for Benecke, Draper and Darnold.
• The evidence is in and it is time for them to resign.

The October 9th DA report states that the Fleming-era trustees will not be prosecuted criminally for violations of the Brown Act for want of evidence of their intent to violate the law. Ignoring the utter shame of the findings of wrongdoing in this scathing report, Benecke, Draper and Darnold are attempting one last desperate spin, claiming that they didn’t know what they were doing was wrong, that they relied upon bad advice from counsel.

Well, the facts contradict this disingenuous argument and, now, there is direct evidence from one of their own that they intended to violate the law.
Read More...
Comments

D.A. report confirms numerous CUSD Brown Act violations -- and demands an admission of guilt

OC DA Seal
Orange County District Attorney Tony Rackauckas issued this morning a 58-page report relating to their investigation of the Capistrano Unified School District Board Board for numerous Brown Act violations. The scathing report confirms that former Superintendent Fleming and his old guard Trustees knowingly violated the Brown Act on multiple occasions.

Here are links to copies of the District Attorney’s
investigative report and cover letter.

The District Attorney has now given the corrupt old guard Board Members a choice. The District Attorney has confirmed that legal action will be commenced against the CUSD Board for these obvious violations of the Brown Act, UNLESS the CUSD Board takes a formal vote to admit their guilt and accept the District Attorney's detailed findings that confirmed the old guard committed numerous violations of the Brown Act. Read More...
Comments

Draper reveals yet another excuse for not discussing the peoples' business in public

page26_blog_entry87_summary_2
Seema Mehta, The Los Angeles Times "During the meeting, the board agreed to settle a potential lawsuit with the general contractor for the district's new $35-million headquarters. The district paid the firm an extra $3.8 million and signed the settlement during a closed-session meeting in August. Although potential litigation legally can be discussed during closed session, prosecutors questioned why once the matter was settled it was not made public. Lubinski asked why the district was trying to "hide" the cost overrun and deemed the superintendent evaluation meeting "a secret board meeting.” Draper said the board discussed in closed session that the payment should not be made public because it could make it easier for other district contractors to drive up prices."

Thanks for the explanation, Marlene. At least now we can all rest easy knowing that the improper concealment of the district’s financial affairs wasn’t your only purpose in violating the state’s open meetings law.
Comments

1990-1991 Grand Jury Report exposes the deep roots of, and players behind the CUSD culture of corruption

It looks like Benecke, Draper and others at CUSD are up to their old tricks ... very old tricks.

page26_blog_entry89_summary_1
page26_blog_entry89_summary_2
Have you read the 1990-1991 Grand Jury report on CUSD’s unethical and illegal conduct during the 1989-1990 Measure A Mello-Roos election?  The issues are strikingly similar to those recently exposed in numerous CUSD scandals, and those recently investigated by the Orange County District Attorney and the 2006-2007 Grand Jury, and which recently became the subjects of formal criminal indictments against former superintendent James Fleming and former assistant superintendent Susan McGill. Read More...
Comments

CUSD Trustee Benecke Violates Brown Act…Again

page26_blog_entry60_summary_1
Board President Refused to Take Action on Properly-Agendized Reform Items

The CUSD Recall Committee filed a formal complaint against Shelia Benecke, President of the Capistrano Unified Board of Trustees, for actions she took during the open session of the most recent CUSD Board Meeting in violation of the Brown Act and other applicable laws.

Read More...
Comments

Signs that CUSD has learned its lessons

New leadership of Capistrano district admits mistakes, changes controversial policy

page26_blog_entry69_summary_1
Editorial, The Orange County Register Finally, Orange County residents are getting some good news from the Capistrano Unified School District, the massive south county district that has been plagued by scandal for several months and controversy for several years. The new administration, headed by interim Superintendent Charles McCully, is settling outstanding legal disputes and admitting mistakes that the district’s administration had made, which sends signals that, perhaps, badly needed reform is in the air. Read More...
Comments

CUSD Trustees Fail To Relieve Superintendent Fleming From His Duties

King Fleming and his#2ECF17
• CUSD Recall Committee Reaction to CUSD Trustee July 29, 2006 Meeting.

• CUSD Recall Committee: Trustees Should Invite District Attorney to Investigate.

Rancho Santa Margarita, CA. Yesterday, the CUSD Trustees once again failed their constituents.

For more than three weeks, each of seven CUSD Trustees have refused to take any meaningful corrective action in response to the allegations and evidence of the Superintendent’s unethical and illegal activities. During the Board of Trustees meeting yesterday, a meeting that was supposed to be focused upon these issues, they failed to protect their constituents, they failed to hold Superintendent Fleming accountable, and they spent a good portion of their meeting praising Superintendent Fleming. Read More...
Comments

CUSD Trustees and Superintendent engage in improper coercion, intimidation and fear

• Superintendent Fleming Has Created a Mafia-like Organization and Infrastructure
• Specific Examples of Coercion, Intimidation and Fear
• We call upon the District Attorney to conduct a full and complete investigation

Fleming 1
Superintendent James A. Fleming and the seven CUSD Trustees have institutionalized a district-wide atmosphere where parents, teachers and administrators are afraid to speak out for fear of retaliation. They improperly use their official office/capacity to intentionally create an environment within the district that makes it virtually impossible for any one to express disagreement with the district without being subjected to retribution or the threat thereof. The CUSD leadership routinely punishes (or threatens to punish) parents and their children, teachers and administrators who dare to speak out against them or their agenda. Conversely, the CUSD leadership rewards those who are loyal and willing to carry out their “dirty work.” Read More...
Comments

$65,000,000 Measure A Bond: Fraud, Conspiracy, Misuse of Public Funds, Conflicts of Interest, Brown Act Violations

• 25% of funds improperly diverted to Fleming pet project
• District employee improperly chaired Oversight Committee meeting
• Oversight Committee disbanded with $20 million still unspent
• Oversight Committee members had financial conflicts of interest
• More Brown Act violations

On November 2, 1999, voters approved Measure A – a $65,000,000 bond measure designed to repair and modernize aging schools, bring them up to current earthquake standards, build four new schools, including a new middle school in San Juan Capistrano and a new high school, and new classrooms throughout the district to relieve overcrowding and solve problems associated with portables, which had covered so many playgrounds, the children lacked places to play.

The ballot measure (and legal bond documents) required that an “Independent” Oversight Committee be established to supervise spending of the bond proceeds. That Oversight Committee was convened on December 15, 1999 when CUSD appointed eleven (11) members. After carefully reviewing the ballot measure and minutes from the Oversight Committee meetings, it appears that CUSD officials made numerous false statements to the public and to Oversight Committee members, several committee members had financial conflicts of interest, and Brown Act violations occurred.

Read More...
Comments